Skip to main content

ATTYtude

Search This Blog

ABORTION from a Biblical Perspective: Body autonomy, murder, or a necessity?

on November 12, 2024

Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

I once dated a guy and we talked about our US political stances.

Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

ORIEL MAGNO, petitioner, vs. HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, respondents; G.R. No. 96132 June 26, 1992

CUE: accused acquitted of BP 22 for deceitful means of financer of warranty deposit TOPIC: Malum prohibitum as exception to the requirement of mens rea CRIME: 4 counts of Batas Pambansa Blg. 22 Accused: petitioner ORIEL MAGNO FACTS: 3 checks - P5,038.43 1 check - P10,076.87 1. Oriel Magno, lacking fund in acquiring complete set of equipment to make his car repair shop operational, approached Corazon Teng, Vice President of Mancor Industries. 2. VP Teng referred Magno to LS Finance and Management Corporation, advising its Vice President, Joey Gomez, that Mancor was willing to supply the pieces of equipment needed if LS Finance could accommodate Magno and and provide him credit facilities. 3. The arrangement went on requiring Magno to pay 30% of the total amount of the equipment as warranty deposit but Magno couldn't afford to pay so he requested VP Gomez to look for third party who could lend him that amount. 4. Without Magno's knowledge, Corazon was the one wh

Albenson Enterprises v. Court of Appeals G.R. No. 88694, 11 January 1993

Topic: Art. 19, 20, & 21 FACTS: Petitioner Albenson Enterprises Corporation delivered to Guaranteed Industries, Inc. at Baltao Building mild steel plates which the latter ordered and as part of the payment, a bouncing check was issued by one “Eugenio Baltao”. Petitioner, in a sincere attempt to collect the sum of money due them, filed a criminal complaint against private respondent Eugenio S. Baltao after the latter refused to make good the amount of the bouncing check despite demand. However, there was a mistake of identity as there were two “Eugenio Baltaos” conducting business in the same building – Eugenio S. Baltao and his son, Eugenio Baltao III. It was found that the signature of the check was not of Eugenio S. Baltao and because of the alleged unjust filing of a criminal case against him, respondent Baltao filed a complaint for damages anchored on Articles 19, 20, and 21 of the Civil Code against petitioners. ISSUE: Whether or not the principle of abuse of rights (Article 1

DIAZ-SALGADO vs. ANSON; G.R. No. 204494 July 27, 2016

TOPIC: Art. 22. The marriage certificate , in which the parties shall declare that they take each other as husband and wife, shall also state: (4) That the proper marriage license has been issued according to law , except in marriage provided for in Chapter 2 of this Title; Art. 23. It shall be the duty of the person solemnizing the marriage to furnish either of the contracting parties the original of the marriage certificate referred to in Article 6 and to send the duplicate and triplicate copies of the certificate not later than fifteen days after the marriage, to the local civil registrar of the place where the marriage was solemnized. Proper receipts shall be issued by the local civil registrar to the solemnizing officer transmitting copies of the marriage certificate. The solemnizing officer shall retain in his file the quadruplicate copy of the marriage certificate, the copy of the marriage certificate, the original of the marriage license and, in proper cases, the affid

Powered by Blogger